<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kinds Of Relativism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/kinds-of-relativism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/kinds-of-relativism/</link>
	<description>In search of questions</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Brown</title>
		<link>http://onphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/kinds-of-relativism/#comment-10167</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/kinds-of-relativism/#comment-10167</guid>
		<description>I've read someof your posts on ethics, and I found that they were unhelpful in answering my question...almost as unhelpful as your curt response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read someof your posts on ethics, and I found that they were unhelpful in answering my question&#8230;almost as unhelpful as your curt response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://onphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/kinds-of-relativism/#comment-10119</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/kinds-of-relativism/#comment-10119</guid>
		<description>Bounded relativistic theories may very well say that the Nazi's are bad.  Simply see any of the posts where I explain my opinion about ethics.  As for the rest: oh yes, I am serious.  So there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bounded relativistic theories may very well say that the Nazi&#8217;s are bad.  Simply see any of the posts where I explain my opinion about ethics.  As for the rest: oh yes, I am serious.  So there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Brown</title>
		<link>http://onphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/kinds-of-relativism/#comment-10102</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/kinds-of-relativism/#comment-10102</guid>
		<description>I don't understand how 'bounded' relativism is any different than plain ol' relativism...does it or does it not say that Nazi Germany was an immoral society? It seems to me that it doesn't since the Nazi's did 'what was best' for their society...

"Almost every ethical theory can be construed as relativism; surely every ethical theory recommends different actions in different circumstances, and so in a way their recommendations are relative."

You can't be serious! The laws of (Newtonian) physics predict different outcomes for the gravitational attract8ion of two bodies depending on their distance from each other, but Newtonian Physics is not relativistic! Ethical relativism is the claim that when two people disagree about some fundamental moral claim (like torture is morally permissible) neither of them is wrong, or alternativley both are right, or alternatively, there is no objective fact of the matter about who is correct...if your ethical view denies this thenit is NOT a form of relativism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand how &#8216;bounded&#8217; relativism is any different than plain ol&#8217; relativism&#8230;does it or does it not say that Nazi Germany was an immoral society? It seems to me that it doesn&#8217;t since the Nazi&#8217;s did &#8216;what was best&#8217; for their society&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Almost every ethical theory can be construed as relativism; surely every ethical theory recommends different actions in different circumstances, and so in a way their recommendations are relative.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t be serious! The laws of (Newtonian) physics predict different outcomes for the gravitational attract8ion of two bodies depending on their distance from each other, but Newtonian Physics is not relativistic! Ethical relativism is the claim that when two people disagree about some fundamental moral claim (like torture is morally permissible) neither of them is wrong, or alternativley both are right, or alternatively, there is no objective fact of the matter about who is correct&#8230;if your ethical view denies this thenit is NOT a form of relativism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://onphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/kinds-of-relativism/#comment-10030</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/kinds-of-relativism/#comment-10030</guid>
		<description>I've responded &lt;a href="http://pixnaps.blogspot.com/2007/06/context-and-relativism.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve responded <a href="http://pixnaps.blogspot.com/2007/06/context-and-relativism.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
